ChrWright
January 3rd, 2010, 11:19 PM
"But this is what I really want."
If you're a designer, I'm guessing that's a phrase you've heard from clients more than a time or two. As a contractor, it's something I've struggled with many times over the years and have seen my design partners struggle with it as well.
How hard do you fight and where do you draw the line when a client wants something you know will yield a result that's less than what they could have had. Even harder, how hard do you push back when what they want isn't architecturally right for the house--or is so completely odd it will hurt the house at resale?
Perhaps that's not the best way to put it. Better said: How much effort do you put into trying to convince them your way is better for them, the house, resale, etc. etc. etc?
I'm a pleasure giver. I want my clients to love what I build for them and get everything they want out of the renovation. The challenge comes when what they want isn't as good as the result they 'could' have. Yes, it's a subjective judgement--and the customer service cliche is that "the client is always right." But as professionals...as experts... we're being hired for our skill, knowledge, and experience. Don't we have a responsibility to stick up for our ideas?
If you've been in the industry for more than ten minutes, then you know there are all manner of creatures in the client forest. Some are shy, some outspoken. Some will trust you implicitly, and some have strong opinions they'll hold back from sharing until the very last minute.
I've often thought that to be a good designer or contractor, you must be equal parts diplomat, psychologist, therapist, and motivational speaker. (Oh, and it helps to be good at designing and building tihngs too :grin:).
This is a discussion that was brought up in Paul's conference session at the Remodeling Show. As part of his presentation, he showed a kitchen of mine that was a complete train wreck from a design/layout perspective. It was an example of "not hot" design--but oddly enough it photographed well and the client adored it. The discussion was 'heated' at times, among the contractors and designers in attendance, over how much we should care about the finished product as long as the client is happy. As a contractor, I don't always get to choose or have input on the things I build--that's life.
Sometimes it's a hard pill to swallow. When my name's on a project--I want it to be as perfect as possible in every way. On this one I was lucky the client loved it. I had little control over the design, so I was really just along for the ride. There were issues along the way, but fortunately we were able to overcome them as best we could and everyone ended up happy. But the risk we all run when the client's driving the bus down the wrong road is that they won't be happy with the destination, and will blame us for not giving them better advice along the way.
For me, this is not a CYA issue. I don't whip out a disclaimer every time a client chooses something I don't agree with. I pick my battles carefully, and do my best to give the best advice I can based on what I think is right. I'm curious to hear other perspectives on the subject, and how the rest of you have dealt with this on your own projects.
If you're a designer, I'm guessing that's a phrase you've heard from clients more than a time or two. As a contractor, it's something I've struggled with many times over the years and have seen my design partners struggle with it as well.
How hard do you fight and where do you draw the line when a client wants something you know will yield a result that's less than what they could have had. Even harder, how hard do you push back when what they want isn't architecturally right for the house--or is so completely odd it will hurt the house at resale?
Perhaps that's not the best way to put it. Better said: How much effort do you put into trying to convince them your way is better for them, the house, resale, etc. etc. etc?
I'm a pleasure giver. I want my clients to love what I build for them and get everything they want out of the renovation. The challenge comes when what they want isn't as good as the result they 'could' have. Yes, it's a subjective judgement--and the customer service cliche is that "the client is always right." But as professionals...as experts... we're being hired for our skill, knowledge, and experience. Don't we have a responsibility to stick up for our ideas?
If you've been in the industry for more than ten minutes, then you know there are all manner of creatures in the client forest. Some are shy, some outspoken. Some will trust you implicitly, and some have strong opinions they'll hold back from sharing until the very last minute.
I've often thought that to be a good designer or contractor, you must be equal parts diplomat, psychologist, therapist, and motivational speaker. (Oh, and it helps to be good at designing and building tihngs too :grin:).
This is a discussion that was brought up in Paul's conference session at the Remodeling Show. As part of his presentation, he showed a kitchen of mine that was a complete train wreck from a design/layout perspective. It was an example of "not hot" design--but oddly enough it photographed well and the client adored it. The discussion was 'heated' at times, among the contractors and designers in attendance, over how much we should care about the finished product as long as the client is happy. As a contractor, I don't always get to choose or have input on the things I build--that's life.
Sometimes it's a hard pill to swallow. When my name's on a project--I want it to be as perfect as possible in every way. On this one I was lucky the client loved it. I had little control over the design, so I was really just along for the ride. There were issues along the way, but fortunately we were able to overcome them as best we could and everyone ended up happy. But the risk we all run when the client's driving the bus down the wrong road is that they won't be happy with the destination, and will blame us for not giving them better advice along the way.
For me, this is not a CYA issue. I don't whip out a disclaimer every time a client chooses something I don't agree with. I pick my battles carefully, and do my best to give the best advice I can based on what I think is right. I'm curious to hear other perspectives on the subject, and how the rest of you have dealt with this on your own projects.