PDA

View Full Version : What Happened?


Dean CRCNA
October 13th, 2010, 06:24 PM
Back in 2000, it was the goal of the federal government to eliminate childhood lead poisoning by the year 2010. As we approach another National Lead Poisoning Prevention Week on October 24 – 30, 2010 … we have to ask ourselves … what happened?

It is amazing to me that as the National Lead Poisoning Prevention Week arrives that it is still permissible for a homeowner or Non- Lead Safe Certified Firm to grab a belt sander and start sanding lead based paint inside a home sending toxic lead dust throughout the home. More amazingly, the paint they are sanding can contain an extremely high lead content.

Even more amazing is that same homeowner can turn around a few days later … sell the house and check no “known” lead hazards on the lead disclosure. This would be true, even though they know there is an 85% to 90% chance that the paint had a high level of lead content when they sanded it.

They may rightly assume a lead hazard was created, but since they don’t “know” for a fact, it would be a disadvantage in selling their home for top dollar if they had a lead test done.

When Mr. & Mrs. Homebuyer walk in and place their young baby on the floor to crawl around … they and their baby will have to pay the price for the lack of enforcement of the lead laws. This price can be that the baby …


Will have a 55% chance of having a criminal record, because of this lead poisoning.
Will drop to a below average IQ.
Will poison her own baby 30 years from now with the lead that will be stored in her bones.


As government statistics and other lead studies show. Who’s to blame? Realtors for failing to warn their clients? The illegal contractor? The uncaring homeowner? The government that makes rules without enforcement?

Ironically, October 24, 2010 (the start of the National Lead Poisoning Prevention Week) comes on the 6-month anniversary of the enacted Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule. This rule was enacted to protect Mr. & Mrs. Homebuyer and their precious baby … yet the creators of the rule have failed to enforce any non-compliance.

In fact, drive around some neighborhoods and you will discover that 50 out of 50 homes that are having repair, remodeling or painting done … are using illegal Non-Lead Safe Certified Firms. If government statistics are right, then hundreds of thousands of children have been lead poisoned during these 6 months of non-enforcement.

It actually seems that the law was created to hurt the legal contractors, while giving a tremendous advantage to illegal contractors. This is because the illegal contractors don’t have to take precautions and can keep their prices low … winning contracts.

The way things have been handled, it makes one curious about National Lead Poisoning Prevention Week 2020.

Bodger
October 13th, 2010, 06:27 PM
I saw the most recent episode of This Old House today. They made mention of RRP and how the lead paint on the project had to be handled and how it was "more costly to the homeowner, but a government mandate".

I was glad to hear Tom Silva put it in that perspective.

JasonW
October 13th, 2010, 06:30 PM
It's about the Government collecting money, that's it. I think we can all read the writting on the wall when it comes to how the EPA will protect the interest of the companies that comply.

THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT YOU. THEY ARE FUNDING THEIR OWN MACHINE WITH OUR MONEY!

kevjob
October 13th, 2010, 06:31 PM
There in lies my issue with this law. HO can check un-known lead and make 125k profit.. Next owner hires me and i tell them lead is assumed and add 800 to the proposal and then I am the bad guy...


Should have required OWNERS OF THE HOUSE to be responsible as well.

kevjob
October 13th, 2010, 06:33 PM
It actually seems that the law was created to hurt the legal contractors, while giving a tremendous advantage to illegal contractors. This is because the illegal contractors don’t have to take precautions..


bingo! I have been saying this all along. Here in Denver we have handymen framing basements, roughing in full baths, no permits nothing, but they finish basements for 15k for 1000 sq ft....:thumbsdown:

naptownCr
October 13th, 2010, 06:49 PM
bingo! I have been saying this all along. Here in Denver we have handymen framing basements, roughing in full baths, no permits nothing, but they finish basements for 15k for 1000 sq ft....:thumbsdown:

$15.00 a square foot that better include a full bath,wet bar and media room!
Freaking thieves.







































:grin:

Bodger
October 13th, 2010, 07:18 PM
I still think the businesses that put the lead in the paint and sold it in the first place should be involved in this as well.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but they have been conspicuously absent from any mention by the EPA as far as I know.

Leo G
October 13th, 2010, 07:44 PM
Something I have said a few times.

RCP
October 13th, 2010, 08:08 PM
I agree, but at the time "it was legal":rolleyes3:

http://sfappeal.com/alley/2010/07/lawsuit-claiming-lead-paint-manufacturers-knew-of-health-dangers-moves-forward.php

Why cant they do a class action like the tobacco?

nEighter
October 13th, 2010, 11:28 PM
I think the homeowner needs to be fined for having a toxic "site" and have to pay for it to be "cleaned" by a certified firm if non certified persons work on their house.

afkama
October 14th, 2010, 12:40 AM
I agree, but at the time "it was legal":rolleyes3:

http://sfappeal.com/alley/2010/07/lawsuit-claiming-lead-paint-manufacturers-knew-of-health-dangers-moves-forward.php

Why cant they do a class action like the tobacco?

The paint companies contend their products were legal at the time they were made and say that landlords rather than paint makers should be sued over any remaining hazards.
If the case goes to trial, the financial stakes could be high.

Exactly. Whether it was legal or not, they were well aware of the toxicity of Lead and the dangers involved and continued to not just use it, but to promote it's benefits.

-TQC-
October 14th, 2010, 05:33 AM
It was a different time then... Hell, even the Surgeon General smoked back then