PDA

View Full Version : Residential Sprinkler Ordinance


Eieio
August 23rd, 2009, 02:19 PM
New Study Finds Residential Sprinkler Ordinance Does Not Hurt Real Estate Market
National Fire Protection Agency Reports Fire Sprinklers Do Not Constrict

Home Buyers or Builders
News Release
August 11, 2009

A new study on residential fire sprinkler ordinances, conducted by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), reveals that mandatory fire sprinkler installation in new homes does not negatively affect the number of homes being built.

Home builders nationwide have argued that the 2009 International Residential Code (IRC), which requires new homes to be equipped with fire sprinklers beginning in 2011, would negatively affect the housing market because of the cost increase to home buyers. However, statistics show that nationally, residential fire sprinklers will only cost approximately $1.61 per square foot, or 1% of the value of the home to install. This cost adds approximately $3,500-$5,000 to the price of the home.

“Over a 30-year mortgage, that’s less than the price of a cup of coffee per week! That’s a small price to pay to save the lives of your loved ones in the event of a fire,” said John Viniello, president of the National Fire Sprinkler Association.

The inclusion of residential fire sprinklers for one- and-two-family dwellings in the 2009 IRC, a response to the growing fire problem in the U.S., could prevent more than 3,000 fire-related deaths and 60,000 serious fire-related injuries across the nation each year, if adopted nationwide without amendment. About 85 percent of all fires occur in the home, fueled by new lightweight construction and more flammable home contents. In fact, the new sprinkler regulations are being endorsed by fire service professionals across the country, such as the U.S. Fire Administration, the International Association of Fire Chiefs, the National Fallen Firefighters Foundation, and the International Association of Firefighters. Groups such as these agree smoke detectors are no longer enough in residential fire protection, as lightweight construction has become more prevalent, house contents are more flammable than ever, and the time to escape a house fire has been reduced from 17 minutes 20 years ago to 3 minutes today, according to a cost-benefit analysis by FEMA.

The NFPA study, Comparative Analysis of Housing Cost and Supply Impacts of Sprinkler Ordinances at the Community Level, was conducted by Newport Partners and compared residential construction in four counties: Montgomery County, Maryland, was paired with Fairfax County, Virginia; and Prince George's County was paired with Anne Arundel County, both located in Maryland. Montgomery County and Prince George's County have sprinkler requirements; Fairfax County and Anne Arundel County do not. The selected areas, all developmentally mature, cover a wide geographic area and contain a variety of housing stock and income levels, making them prime for comparing municipalities with and without sprinkler ordinances in place.

"This study clearly demonstrates that home fire sprinkler requirements do not impede housing development starts," says Jim Shannon, NFPA president. "This report is another point to make the case for enacting life-saving sprinkler requirements in local communities."


Link
http://www.housingzone.com/proremodeler/article/CA6676015.html

naptownCr
August 23rd, 2009, 02:36 PM
I have a hard time with the 3-5K cost. I would imagne it to be a range about three times higher.

Those numbers were based on a study where the sprinkler people could use PEX to install. I also believe it was a passive flush system which eliminates backflow preventers. Some jurisdictions require a closed system and 900 series backflow preventers. These are expensive to install and must be maintained every couple of years which is not cheap ( about $500.00 here)

I am all for life safety and this is a good idea. However it is when the local jurisdiction gets involved and convolutes the process and adds another level of expense to it to satisfy their own wants and desires beyond the IRC that's when I have a problem.

Someday this country will have a uniform building code that is required to be adopted as written with no addendums. That said I will now go back to the crack pipe i was obviously smoking to thinking that would ever happen.

Eieio
August 23rd, 2009, 02:38 PM
I put one in a residential home that was being converted into a daycare facility.

Sprinkler system was about 12K. Upgrade to the water service was 10K

naptownCr
August 23rd, 2009, 02:57 PM
[QUOTE=Servicezunlimited;9214]I put one in a residential home that was being converted into a daycare facility.

Sprinkler system was about 12K. Upgrade to the water service was 10K[/QUOTE

Was this a complete gut and remodel ?

What did they spec you could do? Copper? CPVC? or Iron?

The last one I had to price was in the city of Annapolis and was a retrofit. They did allow CPVC but the system was 10K new water main 5K new main tap and meter by the city 3K add the insulation for the pipes in the attic, boxing in on the first floor and basement added another 4K

This actually never got installed The owner appealed the ordinance to the appeals board and they backed down really quickly. They held up the permit for 4 months until we had the hearing. The city lawyer walked in said we could have our permit if we dropped the appeal.

seems the law was poorly crafted and unenforceable and they had pushed many others into installing sprinklers and had no desire to let this cat out of the bag so to speak.
We had our permit 3 minutes later

Eieio
August 23rd, 2009, 03:06 PM
No it was a retrofit so that the house would meet code to house the daycare center.

It was done in PVC. It was a pain we were trying to save the ceilings all plaster.

Ended up just tearing them all out for the most part and replacing them with 5/8 quite rock.

Our numbers seem to be about the same/close on the work

ChrWright
August 23rd, 2009, 03:07 PM
Wow... this is a new issue for me.

Sounds like a big can of worms for enforcement and maintenance--as Naptown pointed out.

Certification for plumbers, preventer maintenance, insurance issues.

The lifetime "coffee cost" reference doesn't take any of that into account.

Eieio
August 23rd, 2009, 03:14 PM
There are a few local companies that specialize in just sprinkler installations so they pretty much have a good grasp on the costs and installation procedure.

I honestly did not have a clue at that point in time, my plumber caught the water service upgrade, it did not even register on my radar.

naptownCr
August 23rd, 2009, 03:21 PM
Wow... this is a new issue for me.

Sounds like a big can of worms for enforcement and maintenance--as Naptown pointed out.

Certification for plumbers, preventer maintenance, insurance issues.

The lifetime "coffee cost" reference doesn't take any of that into account.

Unfortunately this is how city councils are talked into this. In this case the fire chief was buddies with the sprinkler guys and they talked a councilman to sponser a bill.

There were two incidents that sparked this ordinance.There was a bad fire about four years ago and two fairly popular bartenders died in it. ( Annapolis is known as a drinking town with a sailing problem) This occured in a 100 year old house that was converted to apartments. There were no operating smoke detectors. The other was a fire in a commercial historic building that spread to adjoining buildings.

I can understand the reasoning for the attached commercial space as most of the buildings downtown are ancient and many are wood frame. This was their motivation.

However it spread to include all single family detached dwellings that were being remodeled. The law said if the cost of the remodeling work exceeded the assessed value of the structure than a complete sprinkler system was needed.

My personal feeling on sprinklers is they will protect property more than life.

Smoke detectors in operating order protect life.